Jacob Nevins
2014-06-08 10:40:38 UTC
URL:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22159>
Summary: Gtk2 research report redraw slow with experimental
ruleset
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sun 08 Jun 2014 11:40:37 BST
Category: client-gtk-2.0
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: S2_5/trunk r25086
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: GNU/Linux
Planned Release: 2.5.0, 2.6.0
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Just noticed that scrolling the research report with the experimental ruleset
is slow and jerky. It's smooth and fast with every other ruleset I've tried.
Affects trunk too, but doesn't affect S2_4.
The obvious difference between the experimental ruleset and others is the use
of root_reqs. But S2_4 uses them too, so maybe the differing implementations
of patch #4399 have something to do with it?
(Xubuntu 12.04.)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22159>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22159>
Summary: Gtk2 research report redraw slow with experimental
ruleset
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sun 08 Jun 2014 11:40:37 BST
Category: client-gtk-2.0
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: S2_5/trunk r25086
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: GNU/Linux
Planned Release: 2.5.0, 2.6.0
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Just noticed that scrolling the research report with the experimental ruleset
is slow and jerky. It's smooth and fast with every other ruleset I've tried.
Affects trunk too, but doesn't affect S2_4.
The obvious difference between the experimental ruleset and others is the use
of root_reqs. But S2_4 uses them too, so maybe the differing implementations
of patch #4399 have something to do with it?
(Xubuntu 12.04.)
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?22159>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/